Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video204.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Doubek results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 422.917 faulty-reasoning hits from 204.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,491 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Doubek is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Michael Doubek
Speaker details
Total words: 204.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos204.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.2%36.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 19.2%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos