Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video189.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Cole results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 41.7% saturation with 88.875 hits. Analysis detected 391.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 189.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,402 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Cole is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Michael Cole
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 189.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
19.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos189.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.0%38.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos