Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Alan Thomas results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 165 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,820 of 28,364 speakers). This Michael Alan Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Michael Alan Thomas
Speaker details
Total words: 165
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.3% percentile
33.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos165 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.7%49.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos