Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video3,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Uetricht results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including In-Group Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,829 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (42,171 of 42,528 speakers). This Micah Uetricht is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Micah Uetricht
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠1%Micah Uetricht (selected)3%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 3,829
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos