Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos205.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 205.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,005 of 28,364 speakers). This Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group.
Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 205.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.9% percentile
13.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos205.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 15.5%15.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.8%20.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos