Speaker summary
48% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meridan Zerner results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Burden of Proof , and Confirmation Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 173 hits . Analysis detected 677.245 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,770 of 28,364 speakers). This Meridan Zerner is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Meridan Zerner
Speaker details
Total words: 368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 10.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos368 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 28.6% 28.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 19.6% 19.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Indoctrination: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst