Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Stewart results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,410 of 28,364 speakers). This Meredith Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Meredith Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos