Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meredith Aby results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 493.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.4% and a BS Rank of 71% (8,247 of 28,364 speakers). This Meredith Aby is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Meredith Aby
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
50.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 74.5%74.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 68.6%68.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.5%74.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 37.2%37.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.5%, sitewide 26.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 74.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 68.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos