Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos91.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melesa Johnson results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.7% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,040 of 26,155 speakers). This Melesa Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Melesa Johnson
Speaker details
Total words: 91.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.1% percentile
32.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos91.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.7%75.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos