Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video25.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melanie Stewart results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28.5 hits. Analysis detected 77.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 25.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,395 of 28,364 speakers). This Melanie Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Melanie Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 25.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
57.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos25.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.5%39.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos