Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video88.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mel Lorentz results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88.5 hits. Analysis detected 265.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 88.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,463 of 26,877 speakers). This Mel Lorentz is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Mel Lorentz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos88.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos