Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meghan Howe results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,609 of 28,364 speakers). This Meghan Howe is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Meghan Howe
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
21.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.1%26.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.1%26.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.1%26.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos