Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video130.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Wright results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Actor-Observer Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 110.25 hits. Analysis detected 355.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,655 of 28,180 speakers). This Megan Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Megan Wright
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 130.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos130.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos