Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These McCarty results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.8% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 216 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,846 of 28,364 speakers). This McCarty is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
McCarty
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.8%77.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 55.6%55.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.2%22.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 26.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos