Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mausi Segun results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 75.9% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 693.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,623 of 28,364 speakers). This Mausi Segun is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Mausi Segun
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
55.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 88.0%88.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 75.9%75.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 63.0%63.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 74.1%74.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 48.2%48.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.9%25.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 88.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 75.9%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 74.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 63.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 48.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos