Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video67.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthias Hofmann results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,763 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthias Hofmann is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Matthias Hofmann
Speaker details
Total words: 67.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
71.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 57.4%57.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.4%57.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.6%42.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 57.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos