Speaker summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 298.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Geroni results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,229.298 faulty-reasoning hits from 298.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,927 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Geroni is better (less manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Matthew Geroni
Speaker details
Total words: 298.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.2% percentile 13.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos298.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 33.1% 33.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 28.0% 28.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 21.9% 21.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 33.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.4% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst