Speaker summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 283.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Atencio results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 116 hits . Analysis detected 683.802 faulty-reasoning hits from 283.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Atencio is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Matthew Atencio
Speaker details
Total words: 283.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 13.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos283.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 27.4% 27.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.4% 27.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 18.3% 18.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Composition/Division: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst