Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video14 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Sorrell results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 14 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,692 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Sorrell is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Matt Sorrell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 14
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos