Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Skibinski results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 740.717 faulty-reasoning hits from 356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (22,055 of 28,755 speakers). This Matt Skibinski is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Matt Skibinski
Speaker details
Total words: 356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos356 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos