Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Shumer results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,691 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Shumer is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Matt Shumer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos