Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Ritter results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 60.6% saturation with 33.622 hits. Analysis detected 126.622 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,418 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Ritter is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Matt Ritter
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
47.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 60.6%60.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 43.7%43.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.7%43.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 43.7%43.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 60.6%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos