Speaker summary
⁠42%6 analyzed articles/videos434 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Mahan results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 99.592 hits. Analysis detected 643.699 faulty-reasoning hits from 434 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,236 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Mahan is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Matt Mahan

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.0% percentile
6.1% BS Score6 analyzed videos434 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos