Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Mackowiak results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 161 faulty-reasoning hits from 23 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,688 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Mackowiak is worse (more manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Matt Mackowiak
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 23
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos23 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos