Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video127.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Gorman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Slippery Slope, and Hindsight Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 37.125 hits. Analysis detected 174.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 127.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,580 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Gorman is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Matt Gorman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 127.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.5% percentile
21.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos127.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.1%29.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 0.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos