Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mate Rimac results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Status Quo Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 180 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,679 of 28,364 speakers). This Mate Rimac is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Mate Rimac
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos