Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maryam Kamali results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Halo Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,087 of 28,364 speakers). This Maryam Kamali is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group.
Maryam Kamali
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.5% percentile
51.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 54.9%54.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.2%41.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.4%27.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 54.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.2%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 26.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos