Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Wollstonecraft results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Genetic Fallacy, and Negativity Bias, with Straw Man as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 77.563 hits. Analysis detected 312.563 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,868 of 28,364 speakers). This Mary Wollstonecraft is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Mary Wollstonecraft
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
33.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Straw Man: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.7%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos