Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Doe results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 231 faulty-reasoning hits from 373 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,624 of 28,364 speakers). This Mary Doe is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Mary Doe
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 373
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.1% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos373 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos