Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mary Allison Joseph results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem and In-Group Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 42.8% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 173 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (14,972 of 26,731 speakers). This Mary Allison Joseph is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Mary Allison Joseph
Speaker details
Total words: 173
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
27.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos173 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.8%42.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.1%23.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 42.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos