Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 73.4% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 235 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 73.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,683 of 28,364 speakers). This Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Martin
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠80%Martin (selected)74%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
73.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 73.4%73.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 73.4%73.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 73.4%73.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 73.4%73.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 73.4%73.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 5.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 73.4%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos