Speaker summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 446.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marsha Berry results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Overconfidence Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 123.268 hits . Analysis detected 952.893 faulty-reasoning hits from 446.5 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Marsha Berry is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Marsha Berry
Speaker details
Total words: 446.5
Video count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos446.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.6% 27.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.8% 16.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst