Speaker summary
⁠66%3 analyzed articles/videos178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marlin Stutzman results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Burden of Proof, and Actor-Observer Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 95.889 hits. Analysis detected 510.981 faulty-reasoning hits from 178 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,523 of 28,364 speakers). This Marlin Stutzman is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Marlin Stutzman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠25%Marlin Stutzman (selected)16%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 178
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
15.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos178 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 52.9%52.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.1%4.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate