Speaker summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Orgill results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.6% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 54 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,205 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Orgill is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Mark Orgill
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
38.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.6%38.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos