Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark McCloskey results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 143.233 hits. Analysis detected 522.844 faulty-reasoning hits from 313 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,319 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark McCloskey is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Mark McCloskey
Speaker details
Total words: 313
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos313 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos