Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video152.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Malkoff results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 70.723 hits. Analysis detected 213.337 faulty-reasoning hits from 152.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,849 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Malkoff is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Mark Malkoff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 152.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.1% percentile
27.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos152.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos