Speaker summary
⁠53%3 analyzed articles/videos248.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Jones results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 59.939 hits. Analysis detected 627.41 faulty-reasoning hits from 248.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,160 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Jones is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Mark Jones
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 248.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
13.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos248.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 3.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos