Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Iris results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 87.9% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Iris is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Mark Iris
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
49.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 87.9%87.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 87.9%87.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.9%43.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 87.9%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 87.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 19.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos