Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Blaxter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,079 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Blaxter is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Mark Blaxter
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
67.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 67.4%67.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 67.4%67.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 67.4%67.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 67.4%67.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.6%32.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 67.4%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos