Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video98 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Bathe results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 60.7% saturation with 59.5 hits. Analysis detected 343.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 98 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Bathe is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Mark Bathe
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠50%Mark Bathe (selected)32%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 98
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos98 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 60.7%60.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 48.0%48.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.0%49.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.7%34.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.6%28.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 60.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 48.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos