Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marisela Diaz results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,237 of 26,731 speakers). This Marisela Diaz is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Marisela Diaz
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos