Speaker summary
⁠44%3 analyzed articles/videos260.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marion McFadden results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 387.23 faulty-reasoning hits from 260.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,306 of 28,364 speakers). This Marion McFadden is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Marion McFadden
Speaker details
Total words: 260.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
21.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos260.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.2%55.2%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 14.8%14.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos