Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marianne Franks results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question and Circular Reasoning, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 115 faulty-reasoning hits from 115 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,664 of 37,791 speakers). This Marianne Franks is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Marianne Franks
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠54%Marianne Franks (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 115
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos115 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 49.6%49.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 49.6%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos