Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria McManus results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Genetic Fallacy, Halo Effect, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 74.4% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (8,706 of 25,876 speakers). This Maria McManus is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Maria McManus
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 74.4%74.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 74.4%74.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 74.4%74.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.6%25.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Speaker 74.4%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos