Speaker summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos7,419.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Steiner results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Anecdotal, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 506 hits. Analysis detected 3,376.798 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,419.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (37,896 of 37,901 speakers). This Marc Steiner is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Marc Steiner
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Marc Steiner (selected)1%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 7,419.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos