Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video110 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Ayoub results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 61.916 hits. Analysis detected 146.916 faulty-reasoning hits from 110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,956 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Ayoub is worse (more manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Marc Ayoub
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠55%Marc Ayoub (selected)36%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 110
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.3% percentile
35.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos110 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 56.3%56.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos