Speaker summary
51%5 analyzed articles/videos1,463.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manny Abarca results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 159.17 hits. Analysis detected 2,041.331 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,463.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,577 of 26,781 speakers). This Manny Abarca is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group.
Manny Abarca

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate