Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 512.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,479 of 28,364 speakers). This Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.7% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos