Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video37.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maha results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 37.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,668 of 28,364 speakers). This Maha is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Maha
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 37.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos37.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 15.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos