Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madlin Rivera results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Primacy Effect, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 93.1% saturation with 25.138 hits. Analysis detected 73.138 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,047 of 28,364 speakers). This Madlin Rivera is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Madlin Rivera
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.6% percentile
51.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 93.1%93.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.1%38.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Recency Bias: Speaker 93.1%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 6.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos